• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Philosophy vs. ImprovPhilosophy vs. Improv

Philosophy vs. Improv

  • Episodes
  • About PvI
  • Support
  • Contact

PvI#80: Brief, Alternative Facts w/ David Shields

August 14, 2024 by Mark Leave a Comment

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pscrb.fm/rss/p/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PvI_080_7-25-24.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Important announcement for Chicago-area listeners: On Wed. 8/21, Mark and Bill will record a live episode of PvI at iO Theater (1501 N Kingsbury St.). Our show runs from 6-7 pm followed by a Bill-hosted regular improv event called The Green Room. Admission is free, parking is plentiful, no reservations required. Come meet us!

Internationally best-selling author David wrote a book (and made a film) called How We Got Here, which traces the gradual path in the history of ideas from the ancients through various forms of perspectivism, relativism, and post-modernism to the post-truth discourse that authoritarians and wanna-be authoritarians engage in.

Sponsor: Try online therapy at betterhelp.com/improv and get 10% off your first month.

David’s book is in a very terse style, in line with his overall career emphasis on brevity, so we talk about this choice and how it means in most cases not actually explaining any of the ideas involved much less arguing for his interpretation of them. Instead, a series of quotations and short explanations prompt readers to see the lines of influence themselves. This is not a dismissal of post-modernism due to its deleterious consequences, as he sees the current liberal absolutist reaction (there IS objective truth and morality and Trump and his ilk are ignoring) as foolishly antiquated.

We read some passages and discuss some of the many figures that come up, including Allan Bloom, Levi-Strauss, Vladislav Surkov, plus the various philosophers like Nietzsche that inspired David’s aphoristic style.

We don’t actually get into evaluating the idea that truth is relative (or subjective, or unknowable such that for practical purposes we can treat it as relative), though this has been covered a number of times in past Partially Examined Life episodes, and we’re currently recording a two-episode run on Richard Rorty, who gives among the more comprehensible defenses of this counter-intuitive thesis.

Through some brief improv scenes that David was possibly unaware were happening, Mark and Bill explore whether the denial of the objectivity of truth would be a good campaign strategy, and also what life David’s concise book might leave now that it has separated from his mind and source materials and become autonomous.

The image is from Pinterest. It’s a shield. You’ll have to trace yourself the historical evolution between our guest David Shields and actual shields and images of shields drawn by children.

Hear more PvI. Support the podcast! You’ll get all of our post-game discussions and other exclusive bonus content.

You can choose to watch this on YouTube.

Filed Under: Intellectual History, Philosopher (Solo) Guest, Political Philosophy, PvI episode Tagged With: David Shields, improv comedy podcast, philosophy podcast

Reader Interactions

« Previous Post
PvI#79: Edificial Intentions with Danny Mora
Next Post »
PvI#81: Unshelved, Untitled

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar


What is Philosophy Vs. Improv?

Mark Linsenmayer (host of The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast) and Mary Hynes (Second City instructor) — often along with guests — try to teach each other their crafts via conversation and improv scenes.

Hear Our Trailer

https://podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/secure/partiallyexaminedlife/PvI_Trailer_7-21-21.mp3

Bonus/Ad-Free for 3 shows via Apple

The Complete Improviser

Philosophy Tutoring

Philosophy Tutoring

Testimonials

Mark & Bill are well-matched in being able to so easily articulate the mental processes around their respective pursuits. Whatever sound range both their voices fall within, it's really pleasant on the ears, like listening to two small yet efficient air conditioners placed side by side.

Tim Sniffen (from Jackbox, NPR, The New Yorker, Improvised Shakespeare, Hello from the Magic Tavern)

Philosophy vs. Improv
2021-07-26T04:29:39+00:00

Tim Sniffen (from Jackbox, NPR, The New Yorker, Improvised Shakespeare, Hello from the Magic Tavern)

Mark & Bill are well-matched in being able to so easily articulate the mental processes around their respective pursuits. Whatever sound range both their voices fall within, it's really pleasant on the ears, like listening to two small yet efficient air conditioners placed side by side.
https://philosophyimprov.com/testimonials/149/
0
Philosophy vs. Improv

Copyright © 2026 · The Partially Examined Life, LLC · Log in